sábado, 13 de junio de 2015

Notas Críticas sobre el Capital Humano 8.

En esta oportunidad, presento la quinta y última parte de la traducción de un artículo titulado "Human Capital Theory: A Holistic Criticism", cuyo autor es Emrullah Tan, un candidato doctoral de la University of Exeter en el Reino Unido. El artículo fue publicado en septiembre de 2014 en la revista Review of Educational Research, de la American Educational Research Association. (Tan, E., (2014) Human capital theory: a holistic criticism, Review of Education Research 84(3), 411-445, doi: 10.3102/0034654314532696)

En esta quinta entrega, el artículo expone las conclusiones de la revisión crítica a la teoría del Capital Humano, además de listar las referencias expuestar anteriormente. Para ver las demás entradas que he publicado sobre este tema, hacer click:
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2013/02/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-1.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/02/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-2.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/02/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-3.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/02/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-4.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/06/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-5.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/06/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-6.html
http://ivan-salinas.blogspot.com/2015/06/notas-criticas-sobre-el-capital-humano-7.html


Conclusión
En este artículo, la TCH ha sido discutida desde diferentes puntos de vista; perspectivas metodológica, empírica, práctica, y moral. Primero, debe notarse que la TER, inevitablemente la TCH también, tienen serias limitaciones en su marco analítico con el cual el modelo neoclásico intenta explicar los fenómenos sociales y económicos. Segundo, existen estudios empíricos cuyos resultados están en desacuerdo con la TCH y queda claro que la TCH fracasa en explicar esos casos. Así ¿cuáles son las implicancias de estas limitaciones, o debiésemos abandonar la TCH por completo? De acuerdo a Blaug (1992), estas limitaciones no son razones suficientes para renunciar a la TCH porque para creer que los programas de investigación científica se abandonan en el momento en que una refutación es encontrada es ser víctima del falsificacionismo ingenuo. Lo que se necesita para descartar un programa de investigación científica es que, primero, refutaciones frecuentes; segundo, una proliferación vergonzosa de ajustes ad hoc para evitar tales refutaciones; y finalmente, una teoría rival que explique el mismo problema/fenómeno con un marco teórico diferente pero igualmente robusto. Los oponentes de la TCH están lejos de desarrollar una nueva teoría rival que la reemplace. Como Becker recordó “hay un viejo dicho que dice que necesitas una teoría para vencer una teoría” (citado en Herfeld, 2012, p. 78). Por lo tanto, la existente TCH parece estar acá para quedarse porque, a pesar de sus limitaciones e imperfecciones, es justo decir que es aún una teoría fuerte. Aún más, no solo es fuerte en retórica, sino también sólida y perspicaz en teoría.
Segundo, sobre el homo economicus egoísta, gobernabilidad, la pregunta hecha por Green (2002) necesita ser repetida con un pequeño cambio. ¿Puede la aproximación de la elección racional, que descansa en el interés material propio, de verdad motivar a las personas a tomar decisiones basadas en interés material propio? Es más, “si la aproximación de la elección racional es alterada para permitir preferencias no egoístas, ¿se convertirá gradualmente la típica persona en la sociedad en alguien menos egoísta? (p. 64). En la misma línea, si no hubiese habido TCH o aproximación neoclásica, ¿habrían estado los legisladores menos interesados en gobernabilidad y en crear ciudadanos gobernables? Es algo difícil dar una respuesta afirmativa a esta pregunta dado el hecho de que la historia está llena de gobiernos que han usado la educación como un medio para hacer a sus ciudadanos más gobernables. Por lo tanto, esta actitud no es exclusiva de la escuela neoclásica.
Debe mencionarse que existen algunos intentos por desafiar la TCH en la academia. Por ejemplo, Cunningham (2004) enfatiza el aspecto social de la educación y las afirmaciones de que el aprendizaje es dialéctico entre las dimensiones personales y sociales. Es decir, las personas se enmarcan en sus estructuras sociales, y las estructuras sociales están construidas y formadas por personas. Por lo tanto, un individuo no puede entenderse o conceptualizarse fuera de su propio contexto social y político. De forma similar, Fevre, Rees, y Gorard (1999) afirman que la TCH es a-histórica y basada solamente en la racionalidad instrumental. Lo que Fevre y sus colegas proponen es la teoría sociológica de la participación que toma en cuenta los factores históricos, geográficos, sociales, y culturales que influencian las motivaciones individuales para la educación por-obligatoria. La teoría señala la construcción social de estas motivaciones y afirma que los individuos no son motivados por la maximización de utilidades cuando invierten en educación. Pero, esta afirmación y la teoría en general no están bien sostenidas por datos empíricos. Esto no significa que las dimensiones sociales, históricas, y geográficas no influencien las decisiones educacionales de los individuos sino que una teoría completamente adulta debiese explicar empíricamente un número considerable de casos, al menos de mejor forma que lo que explica la TCH. De otra forma, una teoría sin un sostén empírico sensato puede difícilmente competir con la TCH, sin importar cuán verdadera podría sonar en la intuición.
También es valioso mencionar que la mayoría de las críticas dirigidas a la TCH son más bien seductoras. Estas críticas dan la impresión de que tienen un mejor modelo alternativo para las políticas educativas. Pero algunas veces es bastante notorio que estas críticas están más motivadas por un entusiasmo ideológico lleno de resentimiento para solamente atacar a la escuela de pensamiento dominante, sin contar con una alternativa a la mano. Es cierto que cada crítica es valiosa en sí misma, sin importar desde donde emerja, pero el objetivo ambicioso, reemplazar la TCH, requiere mucho más que eso. Ha existido un gran número de críticas pero pocos esfuerzos sistemáticos por entender el origen y el impacto de la TCH. Se necesita una aproximación sistemática y comprehensiva para analizar y criticar de mejor forma la TCH. Es de esperar que este artículo será estimulante para tal aproximación comprehensiva.
Referencias
Acemoglu, D. (1995). Reward structures and the allocation of talent. European Economic Review, 39(1), 17–33.
Arrow, K. J. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 84(2), 1–9.
Ayton, P. (2012). Judgment and decision-making. In N. Braisby & A. Gellatly (Eds.), Cognitive psychology (pp. 298–394). Florence, Italy: Oxford University Press.
Azzi, C., & Ehrenberg, R. (1975). Household allocation of time and church attendance. Journal of Political Economy, 83(1), 27–56.
Ball, S. (2010). New voices, new knowledges and the new politics of education research: The gathering of a perfect storm? European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 124–137.
Bassanini, A., & Scarpetta, S. (2001). Does human capital matter for growth in OECD countries: Evidence from pooled mean-group estimates (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 282). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/424300244276
Battu, H., Belfield, C., & Sloane, P. (2000). How well can we measure graduate overeducation and its effects? National Institute Economic Review, 171(1), 82–93.
BBC. (2010, March 9). Call to scrap 50% university student target. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8556231.stm
BBC. (2013, October 2). David Cameron suggests cutting benefits for under-25s. Retrieved from www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24369514
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In A. J. Coale (Ed.),Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–240). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2387.pdf
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. (1993a). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. (1993b). Economic imperialism. Religion & Liberty, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-3-number-2/economicimperialism
Becker, G. S., & Ewald, F. (2012). Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker. Public law and legal theory (Working Paper No. 401). University of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/401-bh-Becker.pdf
Becker, G. S., & Landes, W. M. (1974). Essays in the economics of crime and punishment. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum [In matters of taste, there is no dispute]. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.
Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), 143–173.
Bentata, P. (2009). Replacing neo-classical maximization in the realm of human action (CAE Working Papers, No. 63). Marseille, France: Centre d’ Analyse Economique. Retrieved from http://junon.u-3mrs.fr/afa10w21/RePEc/cgm/wpaper/DR_63_0910.Bentata.pdf
Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Edinburgh, Scotland: Stevenson.
Blair, T. (1999, September 28). Tony Blair’s full speech. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/1999/sep/28/labourconference.labour14
Blaug, M. (1976). The empirical status of human capital theory: A slightly jaundiced survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(3), 827–855.
Blaug, M. (1987). Economic history and the history of economics. New York: New York University Press.
Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics: Or how economists explain. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bonanno, G. (2012). Signaling (Lecture notes). Retrieved http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/bonanno/teaching/200C/Signaling.pdf
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1–18.
Bröckling, U. (2011). Human economy, human capital: A critical of bio-political economy. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (pp. 1–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brown, S., & Sessions, J. G. (1999). Education and employment status: A test of the strong screening hypothesis in Italy. Economics of Education Review, 18(4), 397–404.
Brown, S., & Sessions, J. G. (2005). Signaling and screening. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education (pp. 58–100). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Brown, S. L., Brown, R. M., & Preston, S. (2011). A model of human caregiving motivation. In S. L. Brown, R. M. Brown, & L. Penner (Eds.), Moving beyond selfinterest: Perspectives from evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and the social sciences (pp. 75–88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1959). Positive economics, welfare economics, and political economy. Journal of Law and Economics, 2(1), 124–138.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: Michigan Press.
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. London, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., & Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(3), 363–389.
Castagnetti, C., Chelli, F., & Rosti, L. (2005). Educational performance as signaling device: Evidence from Italy. Economics Bulletin, 9(4), 1–7.
Cawley, J., Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2001). Three observations on wages and measured cognitive ability. Labour Economics, 8(4), 419–442.
Clark, A. (2000). Signaling and screening in a transition economy: Three empirical models applied to Russia (Discussion Paper No. 2000/03). Edinburgh, England: Herriot-Watt University CERT.
Coffield, F. (1999). Breaking the consensus: Lifelong learning as social control. British Education Research Journal, 25(4), 479–499.
Cohn, E., Kiker, B., & De Oliveira, M. (1987). Further evidence on the screening hypothesis. Economic Letters, 25(3), 289–294.
Cunningham, P. M. (2004). Critical pedagogy and implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 226–240.
Darmon, I., Frade, C., & Hadjivassiliou, K. (1999). The comparative dimension in continuous vocational training: Preliminary framework. In F. Coffield (Ed.), Why’s the beer up north always stronger? Studies of lifelong learning in Europe (pp. 31–42). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (2011). Higher education: Students are at the hearth of the system (Report No. 2438768). London, England: Stationery Office.
Department for Education & Employment. (1998). The learning age: A renaissance for a new Britain (Report No. 3790). London, England: Stationary Office. Retrieved from http://www.lifelonglearning.co.uk/greenpaper/index.htm
Dessus, S. (1999). Human capital and growth: The recovered role of education systems. Jerusalem: OECD Development Centre.
Di John, J. (2009). From windfall to curse? Oil and industrialization in Venezuela, 1920 to the present. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Dilts, A. (2011). From entrepreneur of the self to care of the self: Neoliberal governmentality and Foucault’s ethics. Foucault Studies, 12, 130–146.
Elster, J. (1982). Marxism, functionalism, and game theory. Theory and Society, 11(4), 453–482.
Elster, J. (1986). Rational choice. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
European Parliament. (2000). Lisbon European council presidency conclusion. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
Fang, H. (2001). Disentangling the college wage premium: Estimating a model with endogenous education choices (Mimeo). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Fevre, R., Rees, G., & Gorard, S. (1999). Some sociological alternatives to human capital theory and their implications. Journal of Education and Work, 12(2), 117–140.
Field, J. (2000). Governing the ungovernable: Why lifelong learning policies promise so much yet deliver so little. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28(3), 249–261.
Foucault, M. (1979). Birth of bio-politics (G. Burchell, Trans.). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
García-Mainar, I., & Monteuenga-Gómez, V. M. (2005). Education returns of wage earners and self-employed workers: Portugal vs. Spain. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 161–170.
Garibaldi, P. (2006). Personnel economics in imperfect labor markets. Oxford, England: Oxford Press.
Glimcher, P. W. (2011). Foundations of neuroeconomic analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gonzalez, N., & Oyelere, R. H. (2011). Are returns to education on the decline? Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1348–1369.
Goodwin, N. R. (2003). Five kinds of capital: Useful concepts for sustainable development (Working Paper No. 03-07). Medford, MA: Global Development and Environment Institute. Retrieved from www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/publications/working_papers/03-07sustainabledevelopment.PDF
Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, S. L. (2002). Rational choice theory: An overview. Waco, TX: Baylor University. Retrieved from http://business.baylor.edu/steve_green/green1.doc
Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2000). Overeducation in the labor market: A meta-analysis. Economics of Education Review, 19(2), 149–158.
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.
Hammond, J. L. (2011). The resource curse and oil revenues in Angola and Venezuela. Science and Society, 75(3), 348–378.
Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 91–214.
Herfeld, C. (2012). The potentials and limitations of rational choice theory: An interview with Gary Becker. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5(1), 73–86.
Heywood, J. S., & Wei, X. (2004). Education and signaling: Evidence from a highly competitive labor market. Education Economics, 12(1), 1–16.
Hinman, L. M. (2008). Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limitation to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hodgson, G. (2004). The evolution of institutional economics. London, England: Routledge.
Hodkinson, P., Sparkes, A. C., & Hodkinson, H. (1996). Triumphs and tears: Young people, markets, and the transition from school to work. London, England: David Fulton.
Hsee, C. K., Lowenstein, G. F., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of option: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576–590.
Hyslop-Margison, E., & Sears, A. (2006). Neoliberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic citizenship. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1496.
Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170.
Jaeger, D., & Page, M. (1996). Degrees matter: New evidence on sheepskin effects in the returns to education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(4), 733–739.
Jenkins, A., Jones, L., & Ward, A. (2001). The long-term effects of a degree on graduate lives. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 247–261.
Johnes, G. (1993). The economics of education. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
Jolls, C., Sunstein, S. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50(5), 1471–1550.
Jones, C. I. (1996). Human capital, ideas and economic growth (Mimeo). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~chadj/Rome100.pdf
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. London, England: Penguin.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Karabel, J., & Halsey, A. H. (1997). Power and ideology in education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Karl, T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kiker, B. F. (1966). The historical roots of the concept of human capital. Journal of Political Economy, 74(5), 481–499.
Krugman, P. (2009, September 2). How did economist get it so wrong? New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economict.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Liu, P. W., & Wong, Y. C. (1982). Educational screening by certificates: An empirical test. Economic Inquiry, 20(1), 72–83.
Luth, A. H. (2010). Behavioural economics in consumer policy: Economic analysis of standard terms in consumer contracts revisited. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus University.
Machlup, F. (1984). The economics of information and human capital (Vol. III). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mankiw, G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Mankiw, N. G., Gans, J., King, S., & Stonecash, R. (2012). Principles of economics. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Cengage Learning.
Manktelow, K. (2000). Reasoning and thinking. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
Marginson, S. (1989). Human capital theory and education policy (Discussion Paper No. 3). New South Wales, Australia: University of New South Wales.
Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Marks, A., Turner, E., & Osborne, M. (2003). Not for the likes of me: The overlapping effect of social class and gender factors in the decision made by adults not to participate in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(4), 347–364.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London, England: Macmillan.
McGuinness, S. (2006). Overeducation in the labour market. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(3), 387–418.
McKenzie, R. B. (2010). Predictably rational? Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2006). Institutions and the resource curse. Economic Journal, 116(508), 1–20.
Mejia, D., & Pierre, M. (2008). Unequal opportunities and human capital formation. Journal of Development Economics, 86(2), 395–413.
Menger, C. (1985). Investigation into the method of the social sciences. New York: New York University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of political economy. London, England: Longman.
Nussbaum, M. C. C. (2010). Not for profits: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
OECD. (2001). Glossary of statistical terms. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1264
Ortega, D., & Pritchett, L. (2014). Much higher schooling, much lower wages: Human capital and economic collapse in Venezuela. In R. Hausmann & F. Rodriguez (Eds.), Venezuela before Chavez: Anatomy of an economic collapse (pp. 187-206). University Park: Penn State University Press.
Patrinos, H. A., & Sakellariou, C. (2006). Economic volatility and returns to education in Venezuela: 1992–2002. Applied Economics, 38, 1991–2005.
Pissarides, C. A. (2000). Human capital and growth: A synthesis report (Technical Paper No. 168). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/poverty/1922754.pdf
Pritchett, L. (2001). Where has all the education gone? World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 367–391.
Pritchett, L. (2009). Does schooling help explain any of the big facts about growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1979). On the weak versus strong version of the screening hypothesis. Economic Letters, 4(2), 181–185.
Purcell, K., & Pitcher, J. (1996). Great expectations: The new diversity of graduate skills and aspirations. Manchester, England: CSU.
Quintini, G. (2011). Over-qualified or under-skilled: A review of existing literature (Working Papers, No. 121). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg58j9d7b6d-en
Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36.
Rodríguez, P., Morales, J., & Monaldi, F. (2012). Direct distribution of oil revenues in Venezuela: A viable alternative? (Working Paper No. 306). Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/files/1426486_file_Rodriguez_et_al_Venezuela_OTC_FINAL.pdf
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Re-framing political thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Schuller, T., & Burns, A. (1999). Using social capital to compare performance in continuing education. In F. Coffield (Ed.), Why’s the beer up north always stronger? Studies of lifelong learning in Europe (pp. 51–61). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Schultz, T. W. (1959). Investment in man: An economist’s view. Social Service Review, 33(2), 109–117.
Schumpeter, J. (1980). Methodological individualism (M. van Notten Trans.). Brussels, Belgium: Institutum Europæum.
Scott, J. F. (2000). Rational choice theory. In A. Halcli, G. Browning, & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding contemporary society: Theories of the present (pp. 126–138). London, England: Sage.
Sen, A. (1990). Rational behaviour. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), Utility and probability (pp. 198–216). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Shaffer, H. G. (1961). Investment in human capital: comment. American Economic Review, 51(5), 1026–1035.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Soldatos, G. (1999). Economics of education and work incentives. Labour, 13(2), 433–443.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Stigler, G. (1987). The theory of price. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Stuart, M. (2005). Learning in partnership: Responding to the restructuring of the European steel and metal sector (Final Report for 5th Framework Socio-Economic Key Action Award). European Commission DG Research.
Sue, D. R. (2004). Cognitive anomalies and the assumption of economic rationality: An empirical investigation of UNC students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://econ.duke.edu/uploads/assets/dje/2004_Symp/Douglas%20Sue.pdf
Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and sociology, redefining their boundaries: Conversations with economists and sociologists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Szelényi, I. (2011, March 5). Smith: The invisible hand [Video]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_ffla6X4Ps&feature=player_detailpage#t=213s
Torvik, R. (2002). Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. Journal of Development Economics, 67(2), 455–470.
Tsang, M. (1987). The impact of underutilisation of education of productivity: A case study of the U.S. Bell companies. Economics of Education Review, 11, 239–234.
Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.
Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80(1), 204–217.
Udehn, L. (2002). The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479–507.
Van der Sluis, J., & Van Praag, C. M. (2004). Economic returns to education for entrepreneurs: The development of a neglected child in the family of economics of education? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11(2), 183–226.
Verhofstadt, E., De Witte, H., & Omey, E. (2007). The impact of education on job satisfaction in the first job. International Journal of Manpower, 28(2), 135–151.
Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2005). The college wage premium, overeducation and the expansion of higher education in the UK. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(4), 695–709.
Weintraub, E. R. (1993). Neoclassical economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html
Weiss, A. (1995). Human capital vs. signaling explanations of wages. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 133–154.
Wolf, A. (2002). Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth. London, England: Penguin.
World Bank. (2010). Silent and lethal: How quiet corruption undermines Africa’s development efforts. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/AFRICAEXT/Resources/english_essay_adi2010.pdf

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario

Comenta/opina acá